Яндекс.Метрика

Issue № 6, June 2018, article № 9

Development of the food market of stavropol krai: tendencies and prospects

The food market represents difficult, multipurpose, organizational and economic hierarchical. the system having the whole range of the specific properties caused by features of his formation, functioning and development. In this regard evolution of the food market and ensuring his further socioeconomic growth is relevant, timely and objectively necessary. Features of development of the food market of Stavropol Krai taking into account current trends are reflected in article. The system analysis of functioning of the regional food market is carried out, regularities, the principles and factors and also key indicators of his development are studied. During the research features and the main trends of the food market of the region are revealed, prerequisites for further expansion of interregional communications are defined. Besides, in work the analysis strong and weaknesses of the food market of Stavropol Krai is carried out that has allowed to plan the most perspective trajectories of further development of regional food productions in the context of food supply and export focused of edge. The conducted research has allocated the most relevant directions of further development of the food market of Stavropol Krai which will allow to develop more effectively production and market infrastructure of the regional food market, increasing thereby the level of socioeconomic development in general and improving quality of life of the population in particular.

Issue № 6, June 2018, article № 14

Integration of digital economy into agriculture: international experience and its application in the russian federation

Research objective is to reveal tendencies of introduction of technology a block chain in agriculture at world level and to consider the prospects of development of similar branches in the Russian Federation. Agriculture always implies high risks - natural disaster, poor harvest or accidents - factors that directly affect the range that the agricultural enterprise can offer. Market conditions and large agro-holdings can also make the life of small farmers a difficult task. Companies often abuse their positions, using expensive fertilizers and patented technologies to gain a competitive advantage. Another problem is the logistics of product delivery. Modern agriculture is influenced by large networks. Manufacturers of food often organize industrial production in developing countries. Then they create large-scale distribution networks for the sale of already processed agricultural products around the world, including developed countries. More often than not, the manufacturer cannot sell its products to consumers directly, he is forced to contact intermediaries or distributors who purchase agricultural products in bulk. Large companies can cheaply and in large volumes produce food and meet consumer demand, but with this approach there is always a surplus of goods that will never be consumed. As a result, a new problem is created: collection and utilization of food products. At the same time, resources such as fuel and fertilizers used for the production and distribution of products that will never be consumed cannot be returned even with the deepest processing of unclaimed products. It is important to understand that food products, agricultural production and logistics are interrelated, and we can solve the above problems in a comprehensive way, primarily with the help of modern technologies, using a scientific approach. Technology blockade offers reliable financial instruments to provide agricultural enterprises with timely and full payment of their labour. The use of these technologies will help to avoid risks and will facilitate the enterprise management. Due to clever contracts, farmers can receive payment during the whole calendar year, and not only seasonally: in summer and in autumn. Using a calculation system based on such digital contracts, it is much safer to work with pre-orders. Smart contracts can include any conditions without the involvement of legal support. For example, using a smart contract, the owner of a small cafe can purchase coffee beans directly from a Kenyan farmer. He can order delivery to Europe, pay for the work of a customs broker and certification in accordance with the laws of the country of delivery. Smart contracts will free farmers from long chains of intermediaries and thereby reduce the final price of the product for the consumer. The introduction of blockages at the stage of production, certification and processing of food products creates transparency and allows consumers to support the suppliers they choose. This is especially true for organic and certified products.

Issue № 6, June 2018, article № 15

Russia and agriculture 4.0

This study examines the need for Russia to switch to technologies of Agriculture 4.0 (Digital agriculture) - the current stage of agricultural development according to the European association of the agricultural machinery industry CEMA. The objectives of this article are: to calculate a technology gap between Russia and advanced economies in the agricultural production; assess technical efficiency of Russia’s agriculture within the CIS countries; analyze the need to switch to technologies of Agriculture 4.0 for Russia. Data envelopment analysis is used as a methodology for the calculations: a metafrontier approach is applied to the non oriented SBM model with constant returns to scale (with two groups of countries: the CIS and the advanced economies; the time interval of data: 2000-2014). The study shows that the technology gap between Russia and the advanced economies is relatively large, and it decreases quite slowly; at the same time, the technical efficiency of Russia's agriculture within the CIS countries is close to unity. This suggests that Russia has exhausted the potential of its technologies in agricultural production, and it needs to apply new ones (Agriculture 4.0), which are estimated to increase the potential output of agricultural production by about 1.8 times at the same cost of agricultural resources. As a source of financing for the introduction of new technologies, it is proposed to change the structure of state support of agriculture (by reducing market price support in favour of increasing support to fixed capital formation).

Issue № 5, May 2018, article № 3